HELP Math 1.0 history and program lineage
A sourced overview of HELP Math 1.0, Boulder Learning’s HELP Math 2.0 roadmap, and the confirmed Boulder Learning–PedaNova modernization partnership.
Resource library
The archive contains useful program and planning documents, but not every file is cleared or accessible for public download. Each item states what it is and how it should—and should not—be interpreted.
18 resources shown
A sourced overview of HELP Math 1.0, Boulder Learning’s HELP Math 2.0 roadmap, and the confirmed Boulder Learning–PedaNova modernization partnership.
A version-labeled record of the former Grades 3–8 catalog, its 73-lesson total, four middle-school series, and historical teacher and learner tools—with the original counting conflict disclosed.
Historical overview of intended learners, instructional design, curriculum descriptions, and the program’s evidence narrative. Counts and claims refer to a past product state.
The retained program-authored source for the 42.1% versus 4.6% pilot figures and grade-level percentages summarized in the research register. A public copy remains pending rights and accessibility review; these figures are not WWC-validated subgroup findings.
The U.S. Department of Education record for the randomized HELP Math 1.0 study of 146 students in Grades 6–10, including the evidence-standard rating and reported findings.
The complete WWC review explaining the study design, sample, comparison condition, outcome measure, effect size, and why the study met standards without reservations.
The ERIC record for a separate 396-student study that provides important context: both groups improved, but the study did not find an overall between-group main effect.
The publisher record for Barbara Freeman’s peer-reviewed study of 50 ninth- and tenth-grade Hispanic English language learners over six months. It examined mathematics ability, self-efficacy, and perceptions of future possibilities; it is historical HELP Math 1.0 context, not evidence for HELP Math 2.0.
The ERIC record for a published article about the design of a middle-school mathematics curriculum for English-language learners. It provides historical design context, not current HELP Math 2.0 evidence.
The official CODiE archive lists HELP Math as the Best Instructional Solution for Special Needs Students in both 2009 and 2010. This dated recognition applies to the historical product.
The publisher’s winners page identifies HELP Math in the special-needs category. The modern site uses the award’s official name rather than the broader wording found on legacy HELP Math pages.
The ERIC record for a federal initiative report that includes HELP in its program history. It provides historical context and is not, by itself, proof of a specific HELP Math funding percentage.
An official IES record for a related web-based mathematics-intervention project led by Texas Christian University. It is linked as related research history, not represented as the HELP Math 1.0 award itself.
The publisher-hosted version of a historical Education Week article linked by the former HELP Math sales-partner page. It is third-party reporting, not a HELP Math effectiveness study.
The publisher-hosted report linked from the legacy partner page. It offers period context on education technology for English learners and should not be read as independent validation of every HELP Math claim.
Historical proposal for a browser-technology update grounded in multimedia learning and sheltered-instruction concepts. Proposed work should not be read as completed functionality.
A planning document for expanded content, diagnostics, learner supports, and platform capabilities. It represents a proposed scope rather than this site’s current feature set.
An overview of source preservation, learning-object recovery, validation, accessibility, and staged product planning.